获取途径

作者

Yin, X. Wang, J. Zheng, W. Ma, J. Hao, P. Chen, Y.

作者单位

a Department of Emergency, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Public Health, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China School of Clinical Medicine, Taishan Medical University, Taian, 271016, China Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

刊名

Journal of Thoracic Disease

年份

2016

卷号

Vol.8 No.7

页码

1688-1696

ISSN

2072-1439;2077-6624

关键词

Coronary artery disease (CAD) Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) Diagnostic performance Exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) Meta-analysis

摘要

Background: Both coronary computed tomography angiography and exercise electrocardiography are non-invasive testing methods for the evaluation of coronary artery disease . However, there was controversy on the diagnostic performance of these methods due to the limited data in each single study. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to address these issues. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to May 22, 2015. Two authors identified eligible studies, extracted data and accessed...更多

Background: Both coronary computed tomography angiography and exercise electrocardiography are non-invasive testing methods for the evaluation of coronary artery disease . However, there was controversy on the diagnostic performance of these methods due to the limited data in each single study. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to address these issues. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to May 22, 2015. Two authors identified eligible studies, extracted data and accessed quality. Pooled estimation of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio , negative likelihood ratio , diagnostic odds ratio , summary receiver-operating characteristic curve and the area under curve of CCTA and ExECG for the diagnosis of CAD were calculated using Stata, Meta-Disc and Review Manager statistical software. Results: Seven articles were included. Pooled sensitivity of CCTA and ExECG were 0.98 [95% confidence intervals : 0.95-0.99] and 0.66 ; pooled specificity of CCTA and ExECG were 0.84 and 0.75 ; pooled DOR of CCTA and ExECG were 110.24 and 6.28 ; and AUC of CCTA and ExECG were 0.9950 ± 0.0046 and 0.7727 ± 0.0638, respectively. There is no heterogeneity caused by threshold effect in CCTA or ExECG analysis. The Deeks' test showed no potential publication bias . Conclusions: CCTA has better diagnostic performance than ExECG in the evaluation of CAD, which can provide a better solution for the clinical problem of the diagnosis for CAD.收起

文献类型

期刊