获取途径

作者

周晓美 刘晓双 柳韦华

作者单位

71000, 泰山医学院护理学院

刊名

Chinese Nursing Research

年份

2017

卷号

Vol.31 No.1

页码

49-53

ISSN

1009-6493

摘要

Objectie: To translate Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire to Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: The scale was introduced into China by using the international generalization program, namely “translation-back translation cultural debugging-pre-experiment”. To assess the reliability and the validity of the scale by item analysis,exploratory factors analysis and confirmatory factors analysis. Results: The content validity indexes of all items were over 0.8...更多

Objectie: To translate Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire to Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: The scale was introduced into China by using the international generalization program, namely “translation-back translation cultural debugging-pre-experiment”. To assess the reliability and the validity of the scale by item analysis,exploratory factors analysis and confirmatory factors analysis. Results: The content validity indexes of all items were over 0.8. The content validity index of the total scale was 0.95. The correlation coefficient between the items and the total score were 0.3880.670. The critical values of all the items were more than 3.0. The exploratory factor analysis method extracted three common factors and retained 24 items. The cumulatie variance contribution rate was 51.895%. The confirmatory factor analysis model was well fitted［χ 2 /df=1.994, RMSEA=0.047, Adjusted goodness of fit index =0.901］. Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.889. Retest reliability was 0.941.Conclusions: The Chinese version of EBPCOQ has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the ability of evidence-based practice of undergraduate nursing students in China. ［目的］对护生循证实践能力评估量表进行汉化，并检测中文版EBP-COQ的信效度。［方法］采用国际通用的量表汉化程序，即“翻译—回译—文化调试—预实验”的方法，将量表引进我国，对其进行项目分析、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析，测定量表的信效度。［结果］所有条目的内容效度指数均大于0.8，总量表的内容效度指数为0.95；条目与总分之间的相关系数为0.388~0.670，所有条目的决断值均大于3.0；探索性因子分析提取3个公因子、保留24个条目，累积方差贡献率为51.895%；验证性因子分析模型拟合良好，χ 2 /df=1.994，近似误差均方根=0.047，调整拟合优度指数=0.901；总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.889；重测信度为0.941。［结论］中文版EBPCOQ具有良好的信效度，可用于我国本科护生循证实践能力的评估。收起

文献类型

期刊

浏览量

11